Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lachlan Gaskell vs Noah Schachter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaskell vs Schachter analysis and find out who is favored!
Lachlan Gaskell vs Noah Schachter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gaskell 0 - 0 Schachter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaskell has won 47.92% of points on their second serve, while Schachter has won 46.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaskell, in recent form, has won 42.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schachter has won 45.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.88% and 34.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaskell has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schachter has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaskell has won 50% of matches played (W/L 2/ 2), with Schachter winning 50% (W/L 30/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaskell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Schachter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 20/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaskell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Schachter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.98% of matches (W/L 26/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaskell has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Schachter has played against players with an average rank of 45.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaskell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schachter has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaskell has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schachter has converted 38.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
840
Rank
789
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
50% (2-2)
Career Total W/L
55% (91-73)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
44% (11-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lachlan Gaskell | Noah Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 44% (11/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 42% (24/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (35/33) | 49% (265/279) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 40% (4/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 122 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 28.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (74/122) | 60% (920/1546) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (49/74) | 70% (641/920) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (23/48) | 47% (294/626) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (3/8) | 39% (60/154) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (42/115) | 39% (572/1477) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 39% (7/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 44% (11/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 20% (15/3) |
Lachlan Gaskell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Lachlan Gaskell
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lachlan Gaskell
Player
John Bernard
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Noah Schachter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Noah Schachter
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Alex Knaff
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Noah Zamora
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Christopher Bulus
55%
(
65 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
4
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
2
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
56 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Noah Schachter
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
7
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Noah Schachter
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Ren Nakamura
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
12
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Miles Jones
Player
Noah Schachter
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Gaskell Vs Schachter Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gaskell are available here and Schachter photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
